Category: Journalism

Bulletin Now Allowing More Commenting Options

While KTVZ has provided commenting features on their new stories for quite a while, the Bulletin only started allowing them recently, and only to subscribers. (KOHD allows comments on their site, too, but KOHD just doesn’t have the up-to-date and depth of content online that KTVZ and The Bulletin have, so there is very little discussion.) The Bulletin has now opened up commenting to non-subscribers as well. KTVZ’s comment system is powered by JS-Kit/Echo and it appears the Bulletin’s is powered by Disqus. Both sites allow you to use your Facebook, Twitter or Yahoo! accounts (among others) to sign in, but you still need to either register somewhere to post on the Bulletin’s site (you can post anonymous, but moderated, comments on KTVZ’s site, which doesn’t appear to be an option on The Bulletin’s site).

I don’t know the relative benefits or advantages of either commenting platform (there is a lot of discussion here), but it’s good to see the options for discussion in the community (since I’ve long shuttered Bend Forums).

Reading Material

Post-Thanksgiving Reading Material

Hope everybody had a good holiday. Back to work. There will be a quiz tomorrow…

Link Dump

Get these links off my desktop, will ya?

Way To Screw Up Big Time, CNN

While I generally think CNN is a better cable news station than some (**cough**Fox News**cough**), it is ridiculous how bad they screwed up this morning.

CNN unnerved the nation Friday morning with live reports of Coast Guard teams firing on a suspect vessel on the Potomac River that would not stop when ordered. We know now it was just radio chatter, part of a “routine and low-level” Coast Guard exercise. And to top it all off, it came on the morning of the anniversary of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

At one point, CNN reported on the air that a reporter had seen a boat challenge Coast Guard vessels and refuse to stop. We now know that did not happen.

Speaking of 9/11, have things changed for the better or worse eight years later? Discuss.

Links For The Day

Long day at the office, but still have some good links to share.

Why You Should Always Check Your Facts…

CNBC’s Jim Goldman Is An Idiot

CNBC’s Silicon Valley Bureau Chief Jim Goldman apparently thinks Macs come with Photoshop, and that PCs need $600 extra to perform as well as a Mac (ideas which he blatantly took from this Business Week article, without credit). He also throws about a bunch of other lies, and recommends Geek Squad (which pretty much shoots his credibility in the toilet with me).

I’ll quote the Giz and this exactly sums up my thoughts about this:

Look, there are some valid reasons to pick a Mac over a PC, just like there are valid reasons to pick a PC over a Mac. But you shouldn’t smear blatant horses**t all over them, especially when it’s already confusing enough for regular people, your audience, Mr. CNBC Silicon Valley Bureau Chief.

I really should’ve stuck with technology reporting like I considered doing out of college with my fancy-pants degree, but I was married and had a kid before I graduated, so paying the bills immediately was of primary concern. While I have a great deal of respect for (most) reporters, money-makers most of them are not.

Oregon Daily Emerald Newsroom Goes On Strike

Without a doubt, the three years I spent in the Oregon Daily Emerald newsroom while I was in college were far more educational than any college class I have (and will ever) take. In this economy, however, newspapers are struggling to survive, so they needed some business oversight to keep things afloat (they decided not to renew the contract of long-time general manager Judy Riedl, which I don’t know if that was necessarily a good idea). The one thing the newsroom valued above all else was their editorial independence from the University. With that independence potentially being threatened because of business-side oversight (and what sounds like an ugly conflict of interest), the newsroom has gone on strike. After reading through it all, I support them for the most part. I have met Steven A. Smith before (if I remember correctly, he came to the ODE during my days there to talk to our newsroom, and I’m sure he was at the 25th anniversary of independence festivities), and I believe he was trying to do his best to help the newspaper survive. He’s a good guy, I’m sure, and his heart’s probably in the right place. However, thinking that he could get $80,000 from the Emerald (who pays their editors far less than minimum wage, mind you) plus work at the School of Journalism and Communication (for another paycheck, conflict of interest be damned) is ludicrous. While he may have been the best candidate for the job, especially considering his background in the professional world as well as at the Emerald, putting him (or anybody else) above the editor-in-chief in the chain-of-command puts that person in editorial control. If that person works for the SOJC as well, you can see the issue. The fact that he didn’t want to be part of the nationwide search for a candidate and won’t go through an interview process (at least according to the Emerald) seems a little suspect as well.

That being said, Steve was not contacted for the Emerald article on the strike, so he may have been able to offer responses to some of those points. Hell, there may be more to this than meets the eye, I don’t know, but I do think it’s interesting, just the same. But it does sound like the Emerald Board of Directors has really shaken things up since Judy’s contract wasn’t renewed. I know their job is to keep the Emerald afloat, but to think they could do it without the newsroom is pretty silly.

I’d also be curious as to what the J-school’s stance is on this, as I know Dean Tim Gleason has been very supportive of newsroom independence in the past.

Steve has since taken himself out of the running, scratching off one of the Emerald’s four demands (which editors have said are all essential). The story has hit Romenesko as has Steve’s follow-up. The Comic Press has some great commentary on it as well (and sums things up nicely). The Emerald staff is publishing updates on a separate site. My guess is that the Oregon Commentator will have something as well fairly soon. Here’s the Oregon Commentator’s support of the Ol’ Dirty.

Update: Day 2 of the Strike, and there are updates all around. Many of the links above have been updated as well with more commentary and links, so I’m going to encourage to read up on those links, as I won’t bother to link to them all here.

An Interesting Ruling For Oregon Bloggers, Commentors and Journalists

Thanks to Oregon’s Shield Laws, the discussion in Oregon just got a lot more open:

When Terry Beard became the target of nasty Internet postings, the Portland businessman discovered that a quirk in Oregon law can make it impossible to clear your name, no matter how outrageous the attack.

A judge in Clackamas County ruled that an Oregon law that allows newspapers to shield the identity of news sources also protects anonymous writers who post comments to media Web sites.

The Web sites could not be compelled to identify the writers, Circuit Judge pro tem James Redman ruled and, under federal law, were not responsible for the comments.

In other words, Beard found out, you can say almost anything about anybody on an Oregon media Web site without fear of being unmasked by a lawsuit or prosecuted for libel, defamation or invasion of privacy.

Thanks Barney for the link